Tuesday, March 1, 2011
Utah Senate Rule Committee Votes Against Bill Aimed To Protect Gay And Transgender Citizens State-Wide From Discrimination In Areas Of Employment And Housing; Senate President (And Republican) Waddoups States Anti-Gay Stupidity
An update on a previous post, the Salt Lake Tribune reports that an attempt by State Senator Ben McAdams (Democrat-Salt Lake City) to force a Senate committee hearing on a bill intended to protect all gay and transgender Utahans from employment and housing discrimination failed on a party-line vote Monday, McAdams having tried the procedural move to force the hearing after it had been blocked in the Senate Rules Committee for more than three weeks. McAdams said there is discrimination occurring and the consideration of Senate Bill 148 would give gay and transgender Utahans hope and assurance that the law will protect them. “Some of you may worry about the controversy and hateful e-mails you might receive,” McAdams said. “I believe the dialogue will be respectful and it will be constructive. … I refuse to accept that religious liberty is incompatible with protection of gay and transgender people in their home and on the job.” But Rules Committee Chairwoman Margaret Dayton Republican-Orem) said that with 1,200 bill requests filed, not everyone gets a hearing and McAdams should not receive special treatment. Sen. Chris Buttars (Republican-West Jordan) again stated he does not believe there is a problem that McAdams’ bill would solve. “I don’t know why we try to press these things out like this when there isn’t a demand for it,” Buttars said. McAdams’ effort failed 21-7 on a party-line vote. As if on cue, Senate President Michael Waddoups (Republican-Taylorsville), who is also a property manager, said “There are reasons there should be exceptions to” anti-discrimination ordinances, adding that “a person who owns a duplex, for religious reasons, may not want to have someone in the other half of their duplex.” Pressed on what those reasons might be, Waddoups said he was only repeating what constituents had told him. Waddoups said McAdams should thank the Senate for not allowing his bill to have a hearing, because he believes that the body could have rolled back the 11 community ordinances. McAdams said he would still try to get a hearing for his bill but recognizes the chances of that happening this year are slim.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment